Restructuring the Expense Base
... creating an environment where costs are better
aligned with revenue and profit
Many companies are struggling with
how to go about restructuring their business models to reduce costs and create
an environment where costs are better aligned with revenue and profit. That is,
reducing the fixed cost base and turning some of the cost reduction into a
variable cost so that if headcount or transactions are reduced due to a
business contraction, costs are also reduced automatically. Conversely, if the
business grows, expenses grow consistent with the upturn in volume in a
predictable way.
This challenge requires some level
of “out of the box” thinking. It requires companies to face options that may be
culturally difficult for them to implement. Meeting this challenge may require
a company to consider outsourcing certain, non-strategic technology support
functions or to consider restructuring or outsourcing certain business
processes. This kind of thinking doesn’t come naturally to most companies,
especially when addressing business processes. There is the natural tendency to
assume that no outside firm can understand your own business model well enough
to deliver quality service at aggressive cost structures and ensure high client
or end user satisfaction levels.
Technology Infrastructure
When technology support functions
are outsourced a company can leverage buying
power and the process excellence of the outsourcer. This usually produces some
savings, often considerable savings. It should also result in an agreement,
with measurable service levels, for the technology elements supported and unitized
pricing that more closely matches the state of your business.
In the area of technology
infrastructure outsourcing there are several areas of opportunity that can be
applied successfully to almost any company, regardless of size. Desktop (PC)
support, server management, network management, security management, storage management and
application maintenance are some of the areas of opportunity worth exploring.
We have addressed two of these potential areas below.
Desktop Support – Most non-manufacturing companies have
at least a one-to-one ratio of PCs and telephones to the employee base.
Supporting this base requires periodic capital investments, software licenses,
maintenance contracts, support staff (with offices, training, support tools and
other hidden costs) and many other costs that aren’t evident. The Gartner Group
and META have programs to help financial
executives identify the total cost of ownership (TCO) of these desktop assets.
If the management team needs to cut expenses, they can’t always predict what
impact the expense reduction will have on business productivity because service
levels aren’t defined or measured, they have just evolved over time.
Companies that
support and manage their desktop requirements with internal staff find their
cost base does not always respond directly to the economic environment. For example, a
15% reduction in staff may not result in any cost reduction for desktop support
for a year or more without imposing severe service level reductions on the
remaining user community. As growth occurs companies often experience little
increase in cost for a period of time (typically for the additional cost of new
PCs and telephones) and then a substantial increase in costs as the other cost
elements are expanded to support the larger user base (for support staff,
software licenses, support tools and the like). Figure 1 illustrates the dynamics
of an internally managed IT desktop infrastructure as the business expands or
contracts.
Figure 1
An outsourcing arrangement for desktop
support can be structured to incorporate the capital cost of acquiring the
hardware, the software licenses and a series of defined support functions for a
fixed monthly cost per desktop (or laptop) under contract. These contracts
invariably contain defined, measurable service levels covering items like
response times for the outsourcers Help Desk, time to repair a malfunctioning
desktop and percentage of problems repaired remotely (through the outsourcers
Help Desk). Because so many of the service elements are carefully defined and
measured management is in a position to determine the impact on their cost base
and their business productivity when varying service levels.
The result of contracting for desktop
support in this way is a monthly cost base that is more responsive to business
conditions, an infrastructure that is more scalable in the event of rapid growth
or contraction and a measurable service level benchmark that is also closely
aligned with the cost structure. Figure 2 illustrates the dynamics associated
with an outsourced desktop infrastructure during business contractions and
expansions.
Figure 2
Server Management – As companies grow their investment
in business
applications their computing platforms (servers) generally grow as well. The
business applications that support financial consolidations, inventory
management, client business services, regulatory compliance, human resource
applications and other critical business functions are housed in raised floor
data centers and supported by technology experts with an enormous appetite for
training, support tools and consultants. Once again the costs of supporting
this ever changing, business critical environment are not always easy to get at
and often don’t respond very well to changing economic conditions. In some
cases, a lack of capital investment to upgrade critical platforms to contemporary
technologies results in evolved platforms that are:
A fair amount of the expense associated
with supporting this kind of environment is tied up in capital infrastructure
(space, power, air conditioning and the cost of the latest computing
technology). If the business mission requires seven days per week, twenty four
hours per day technical support, the support expense can grow very rapidly. The
company’s ability to maintain a staff of competent professionals can be
severely strained.
More often than not, service levels are
not adequately defined nor are they consistently measured when handled by
internal staff. More importantly change management processes used by internal
staffs are rarely as mature as those used by outsourcers. Immature change
management processes, the processes used when modifying a technical
configuration or an application configuration, generally result in an unexpected
loss of application availability to the user community and potentially an
adverse economic impact on the business enterprise.
Servers don’t need to be physically co-resident with the user community or
with the technical support staff. The availability
of low cost telecommunications facilities makes it economically feasible to locate the
production servers off-site at an outsourcer’s facility. Furthermore, servers
and associated storage capacity can be obtained in ways that limit the periodic
capital investment usually associated with maintaining these platforms. Support
of a group of business production servers closely parallels the environment
described above for supporting desktops. The outsourcer will develop a monthly
cost per server that incorporates the capital acquisition of the server,
software licenses required to support the specific business requirements and a
service level agreement that defines the outsourcer’s responsibilities in great
detail. The company’s technology staff can be reduced
and focused on supporting the business applications residing on the servers.
The dynamics associated with outsourced
server infrastructures are similar to those associated with outsourced desktop
infrastructures. The company pays for the number of servers required to support
the business. If the business environment changes resulting in a reduction of
transaction volumes that leads to a reduction of servers required to support
specific business applications, costs for supporting and maintaining the
installed base of servers is reduced appropriately. Conversely, if rapid growth
requires greater computing capacity, expense increases will more closely match
the related business increase. The benefits of outsourcing the servers that
support your critical business applications parallel those referenced in the
previous section.
Business Processes
Business functions / processes are
somewhat more difficult to assess and impact effectively. Re-engineering
processes usually requires some sort of transformation change agent. Many
companies utilize outsourcing as a mechanism for driving difficult process
changes. Although Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) is more complex than
Technology Infrastructure Outsourcing (TIO), BPO offers greater opportunity to
reduce costs and align costs with the business environment than does TIO.
How many companies today handle
their own employee payroll functions? ADP is one of America’s largest business
process outsourcers, and most companies don’t consider that they have already
outsourced at least one aspect of their business.
Opportunities often exist in HR /
benefits management, billing and collections processes, customer service, to
name a few typically promising areas. To identify the areas of opportunity,
companies find greater success in utilizing external change agents.
External change agents are people with expertise in:
identifying promising areas of opportunity within the business
identifying outsourcers with functional skills, industry knowledge,
leverageable assets and quality track-records
developing business cases with the supporting financial
and business related considerations clearly defined for senior management
articulating the strategic values associated with outsourcing
a specific area of opportunity
developing the tactical plans required to implement an
outsource opportunity, once it has been approved
The external change agent is also
critical to ensure that internal vested interests don’t derail an opportunity before
it can be fully explored. Most business process change investigations meet a
fair amount of resistance that must be overcome. The external change agent must
have the ability to engage internal management and professionals in the
process, listen to valid concerns and issues, diffuse potential difficulties,
and communicate effectively to all parties to ensure a successful transition.
Under a Business Process
Outsourcing (BPO) arrangement a set of processes are identified that constitute
a definable set of results. In the case of payroll, the BPO arrangement is
designed to provide for accurate and timely distribution of payroll checks as
well as the calculations appropriate for taxes, benefits deductions, savings
plan contributions, etc. The BPO service provider must link into human resource
and financial databases maintained by their clients, or generate data feeds to
and receive data feeds from their clients. How the checks get prepared for
distribution is not material to the client contractual relationship. Only the
Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are important. The SLA defines, for example,
when the checks must be available for distribution, standards for accuracy and
reporting requirements. Figure 3 illustrates the Payroll BPO model.
In the Payroll model, the BPO
service provider charges the client a flat price per employee. That price is a
function of the service characteristics and SLAs associated with the service.
As the company grows its employee base, payroll costs increase in direct
proportion to the employee increase. Similarly, costs decrease proportionately
for companies experiencing employee contraction. This type of model keeps fixed
costs to a minimum and variable costs closely tied to the economic conditions
as they relate to employees.
Figure 3
There are several varieties
of BPO models that can produce similar expense base restructuring. These models
either focus on the generic functional processes (e.g. payroll, HR management,
invoicing, telecommunications bill and contract management) or they are more
industry focused (e.g. insurance policy administration, stock transaction
clearing and settlements, credit card processing, laboratory testing, supply
chain management). The common denominators across both the generic and industry
specific models are the unitized pricing (per transaction, per employee, ...) and
the Service Level Agreement to define the standards of performance.
Summary
Restructuring the expense base from
a high percentage of fixed costs with low variable cost content to a lower
fixed cost base with higher variable cost content often implies
moving some service
functions outside of the enterprise to firms with process excellence and scale.
These same companies can act as transformation change agents to spur
improvements in internal processes and provide service level benchmarks that
allow management to make financial decisions with predictable service impacts.
During difficult
economic times those companies able to appropriately align their expense base
can more effectively focus on business-growing initiatives in order to prosper
rather than focusing most of their organizations energy reacting to
drastic cost cutting initiatives in order to survive. The right combination of foresight, internal sponsors,
external change agents and partners can mean the difference between growing (in the face of an adverse business climate) and struggling to survive.
|